Makes you think they post stuff up and never look at the comments....

I certainly would not bother with using anything they came up with, not after that!

sandrascookbook.com

Sandra,

I'm still compelled to give them the benefit of the doubt. I have no evidence that the right people are getting the message, so I could be the one fumbling and stumbling here. I can't bring myself to hold the whole magazine responsible for the actions of a select few. Not yet, anyway.

How do we tell a stubborn, blind and deaf guy when his fly is open? And do we get mad at him and storm off or give the guy a chance?

Gina,

The difference is this is not 'one guy' it's an organisation. They have the faculties, just don't seem to be using them! :)

Sandrascookbook.com

Maybe they like stirring a reaction?...That could be why they still won't respond, because they like hearing from me! LOL! I tried again today:

http://www.saveur.com/article/recipe/Chec-Cu-Nuca-Romanian-Walnut-Panettone

Scroll down to the comment section. I'm beginning to disbelieve there's such thing as an Online Editor, to whom several messages have been sent via "Contact Us" link.

frick,

Nadia is looking for her grandmother's recipes for you.

~Gina

http://www.saveur.com/article/recipe/Chec-Cu-Nuca-Romanian-Walnut-Panettone

And there you have it. Saveur finally responded. Any thoughts? Opinions?

If you suspect I have a few of my own, you are right!

~Smartypants

Putting it politely, I would now take anything they say with a hefty pinch of salt - I will not be trying anything of theirs.

sandrascookbook.com

as responses go, that one seems pretty feeble....it took them 3 weeks to say 'the recipe is correct'?....maybe we're all a bit spoiled after dealing with KAF and getting quick answers - and corrections when needed -to our questions?

i'm with sandra...i don't think i'm going to take that website too seriously....there are too many other, better choices.